hi, I can't figure out what you consider an issue in using a DI dispatch. Just to understand :)
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > I took a quick look at > http://code.google.com/p/orcades-gwt-spring/wiki/orcadesGWTSpringHandler > Not bad, but it still needs managed beans which is managed via a .xml > file or annotations. > I'm suggesting something that doesn't even need that ... > the caveat is that my soln uses a name-design pattern (which might not > be a caveat) > > Cheers, > Henry > > On Jan 23, 2:16 am, olivier nouguier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi > > It's quite easy to implement a GWT dispatcher. At least with spring, > then > > use autoscan feature: > > > http://code.google.com/p/orcades-gwt-spring/wiki/orcadesGWTSpringHandler > > HIH > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So far, > > > > > I found there are a few ways to redirect your serviceimpl, namley > > > 1) logic in web.xml > > > 2) gwt-dispatch > > > 3) various framework plugins (for struts, jsf) > > > > > But each of these solns above require you to edit a config file (or > > > modify a java file with guice) > > > everytime you add a new serviceimpl. > > > Would it be possible to have an auto-config, so that if you follow the > > > standard naming > > > convention of > > > XXXService.java > > > XXXServiceAsync.java > > > XXXServiceImpl.java > > > > > that you won't have to add any more configurations. > > > i.e. > > > the service endpoint is something like > > > /gwt/GwtNameDispatcher > > > > > and GwtNameDispatcher is written so that it invokes the respective > > > ServiceImpl > > > w/o reading any configs files. GwtNameDispatcher knows which > > > ServiceImpl to invoke > > > based upon what Service object was passed in the GWT-RPC post param. > > > The caveat is that you must follow the > > > XXXService.java > > > XXXServiceAsync.java > > > XXXServiceImpl.java > > > pattern, but if I write such a GwtNameDispatcher beast, would this be > > > useful > > > to the GWT community? > > > Is there a better soln? > > > > > Cheers, > > > Henry > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > <google-web-toolkit%[email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > -- > > A coward is incapable of exhibiting love; it is the prerogative of the > > brave. > > -- > > Mohandas Gandhi > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- A coward is incapable of exhibiting love; it is the prerogative of the brave. -- Mohandas Gandhi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
