why not? ;)
On 4 fev, 15:23, Marcos Alcantara <marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. > > About the @GwtTransient, in my case, I´m only using model classes > defined within the GWT module. Although I love what Gilead has done > for us, I think if it would be possible to eliminate the performance > overhead and let GWT serialize my JPA annotated classes directly. > > Would it? > > =) > > thanks > > Marcos A. > > On 4 fev, 13:46, Open eSignForms <yoz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, this was a big problem for us since it meant creating lots of DTOs and > > server-side routines that generated them from its existing objects and could > > consume them for updates. > > > I don't know the internals of GWT compiler, but it sure would be nice if > > fields and methods and constructors could be annotated to be ignored and > > never translated to JS. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
