On Mar 2, 4:39 pm, Rajeev Dayal <[email protected]> wrote: > While you might be able to make something work > out here, it would definitely not be supported behavior (as we've not > thought through this use case).
Thanks, that's what I needed to know - I'd personally only use it, if it were supported behavior (with rules like "always drop any non- existent fields", or rather "make specially annotated fields optional" etc.) Maybe really worth thinking about it... Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
