No, it wasn't the same problem... I didn't notice that I didn't have a no-arg constructor there.
Thanks, Yaakov. On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Paul Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is this a GWT problem where it fails because I am using generics??? >> > Probably. I see you've already found the issue: > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2374 > > However, do be aware that merely implementing Serializable does not make > something gwt-serializable. You also need a no-arg constructor and all > non-transient non-final members to be gwt-serializable. > > Paul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
