Just noticed that the issue has a workaround:

filter: literal("alpha(opacity=50)");

On Mar 19, 2:14 pm, PhilBeaudoin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have the exact same problem withopacity. When I add the IE-
> specific:
>   filter: alpha(opacity=20);
> The CSS resource to fails to compile. The IE8 version:
>
> seems to work fine.
>
> I haven't looked for a workaround, yet, but all I can think of will
> look like an ugly patch...
>
> I've found the bug in the issue tracker 
> at:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4688&q=C...
>
> Please star it if you've had this problem too.
>
> On Mar 17, 1:01 pm, nogridbag <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I figured out the answer to question 2.  I just had to add @NotStrict
> > annotation.  Questions 1 and 3 still perplex me.
>
> > On Mar 17, 3:45 pm, nogridbag <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > 1) @external not working as expected
>
> > > The GWT doc states that if you mark a style as @external it won't be
> > > obfuscated and it doesn't need an associated method in the CssResource
> > > interface.
>
> > > So for instance:
> > > @external legacySelectorA, legacySelectorB;
> > > .obfuscated .legacySelectorA { .... }
>
> > > When I do this, the style: ".obfuscated .legacySelectorA" will simply
> > > be ignored and will not show up in the generated CSS.  All other
> > > styles that do not use an @external style appear fine in the CSS.
>
> > > There's no errors generated.
>
> > > I thought maybe I could only have one @external annotation in the CSS
> > > file so I moved all the external styles into one big annotation at the
> > > top of the file:
>
> > > @external abc, def, ghi, blah, blahblah, blahblahblah
>
> > > Putting them in one @external annotation at the top of the file
> > > generates errors so I'm assuming this should not be done.
>
> > > 2) How do I simply bundle a simple CSS file without obfuscating it?
>
> > > I thought I could simply create a CssResouce (without subclassing),
> > > and specify an annotation so that it's just treated as a static
> > > resource.
>
> > > Both the link (html) and stylesheet tag (in module descriptor) are
> > > deprecated according to the documentation.  I would like slowly
> > > transition CSS files to the new CssResource method without adding 50
> > > million @external annotations everywhere.  The styles are referenced
> > > all throughout our project as strings like addStyleName("my-style")
> > > and I don't want to break this functionality at the moment.
>
> > > 3) How can I have an "=" sign in a style?
>
> > > @if user.agent ie6 ie8 {
> > >         .my-style img { filter: alpha(opacity=20); } */} @elif user.agent 
> > > gecko gecko1_8 {
>
> > >         .my-style img { -moz-opacity: 0.2; }
>
> > > }
>
> > > The "=" sign in the IE specific string generates an error.
>
> > > --------------
>
> > > Finally, this isn't a question.  It's more of a general comment.  So
> > > far the experience using the CssResource has been pretty painful.
> > > Much of our CSS involves customizing the GXT library's stylesheet.
>
> > > So if you have a style like this:
> > > .my-tab-panel-header .x-tab-strip-top .x-tab-strip-active .x-tab-right
> > > span.x-tab-strip-text
> > > ...it quickly turns into annotation hell especially since I often have
> > > the same external styles referenced in two spots.  Here, we're
> > > slightly customizing the GXT tab panel adding three styles.
>
> > > @external .x-tab-strip-top, .x-tab-left
> > > .my-tab-panel-header .x-tab-strip-top .x-tab-left {
> > >         .. one CSS style
>
> > > }
>
> > > @external .x-tab-strip-top, .x-tab-strip-inner
> > > .my-tab-panel-header .x-tab-strip-top .x-tab-strip-inner {
> > >         .. one more CSS style
>
> > > }
>
> > > �...@external .x-tab-strip-top, .x-tab-strip-active, .x-tab-strip-inner
> > > .my-tab-panel-header .x-tab-strip-top .x-tab-strip-active .x-tab-strip-
> > > inner {
> > >         .. one more CSS style
>
> > > }
>
> > > I wind up having more @external annotations all over the document than
> > > I do actual CSS code.
>
> > > Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to