Okay, I don't understand how this should work...

So, you mean:
1. Requesting the application for example 'http://appname.appspot.com/
singnup?asdfghjkl'
2. A httpServlet gets this
3. The httpServlet makes anything on the html document
4. The html is called
5. In the OnModuleLoad this anything will be evaluated
6 According to this evaluation the right module will be loaded.

Is this right?

On Apr 20, 1:03 pm, Jan Ehrhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can add a property (e. g. a Dictionary) to your host page. Your entry
> point checks the property and loads the required module. Setting the
> property is a task, the server has to do.
>
> I think, using one host page instead of two different pages with two
> different URLs might be more efficient.
>
> Regards
> Jan Ehrhardt
>
> 2010/4/20 Jochen Schnaidt <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> > Okay, I read the docs and understand most of it. Is it possiple to
> > describe which sequence should be loaded by the URL?
>
> > I planed that 'http://appname.appspot.com'is the administration and
> > 'http://appname.appspot.com/singnup?asdfghjkl'
> > is the signup page for event 'asdfghjkl'.
>
> > I don't know if it is possible. My next step was to learn about
> > servlet. But for a servlet I need a site to show my data, this is how
> > I came to the 2nd page. I understand it this way, that code splitting
> > mainly works on user events. So I need something like a switch in my
> > onModuleLoad with the different splitpoints in the cases and the URL
> > parameter in the statemant.
>
> > Is this right?  Is it feasible?
>
> > On Apr 20, 11:17 am, Jan Ehrhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > In GWT 2.0 code splitting was introduced. You can have one big
> > application,
> > > that contains both modules. In the standard case you load your
> > application
> > > as before. In the registration case you can load a second module and use
> > it.
> > > This is much better than having two applications with different entry
> > > points. It also allows you, to have some basic infrastructure, that's
> > used
> > > by both modules. So you can create a third module.
>
> > > If you design this correct, you'll get an extendable and modularized
> > > application, that loads modules if required. That happens all in the same
> > > host page, so no page reload.
>
> > > Regards
> > > Jan Ehrhardt
>
> > > 2010/4/20 Jochen Schnaidt <[email protected]>
>
> > > > Hi all,
>
> > > > I have a question about the design of a GWT project.
> > > > I am working on an application for registration to events based on GWT
> > > > and GAE. The application consists of three modules: administration
> > > > (create, edit an event and reporting), signup (registration of guests)
> > > > and a ‘desktop’ for the people working on the desk.
> > > > At the moment I am finishing the first part administration. It is a
> > > > classical RIA based on a DockLayout on one webpage. What I need now is
> > > > a second Webpage where I can send my guests to register them to an
> > > > event. I read a lot about this in the community but never found an
> > > > answer how to do it right.
> > > > When I add a second Webpage to my project and add a second entry point
> > > > to the XML everything dumps.
> > > > Must I create a second GWT project or is it possible to integrate this
> > > > functions in a separated part of the existing project?
>
> > > > Ideas, comments are welcome.
>
> > > > Thanks a lot, greetings Jochen
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]>
> > <google-web-toolkit%[email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]>
>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]>
> > .
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to