Brilliant! :)

I trust it's working. I'll give it some time and check Google's cache
on my pages in a few weeks.

Thanks Kathrin and R for your help! I really appreciate it! :)


On Apr 20, 7:42 am, Katharina Probst <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I see your point - it's a bit confusing that Fetch as Googlebot only "works"
> with the _escaped_fragment_, but arguably it's also "more correct" this way
> (plus it lets you see the difference between the two versions).  I will pass
> along the feedback.  Meanwhile, I'm glad it seems to have worked out for
> both of you.
>
> kathrin
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 5:58 AM, RPB <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Dusty,
>
> > I noticed the same thing when testing the Ajax crawlability for my
> > website:
>
> > Googlebot didn't return me the static page if I run 'fetch as
> > googlebot' forhttp://www.bookwhack.com/us/
> > But it works fine forhttp://www.bookwhack.com/us/?_escaped_fragment_=
>
> > However, I can see in webmaster tools that my pages are now being
> > crawled. So I suspect that the 'Fetch as Googlebot' tool takes the
> > request at face value and does not process the <meta name="fragment"
> > content="!"> but the actual crawler notices the fragment and ensures
> > the bot also crawls the escaped fragment . So I believe that as long
> > as you are seeing the correct page when you fetch as googlebot with
> > the ?_escaped_fragment_= you should be ok.
>
> > Just sharing my experience, happy to be corrected if any of the above
> > is incorrect.
>
> > -R
> >www.bookwhack.com
>
> > On Apr 20, 12:57 am, Dusty <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I asked it to fetchhttp://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/
>
> > > If I ask it to fetch either:
> >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/#!http://friendorfoll...<http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/#%21http://friendorfo...>
>
> > > It works correctly.
>
> > > Shouldn't it also work for the plain URL?
> >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/
>
> > > When I try the plain URL it doesn't show the whole indexable HTML.
>
> > > Thanks again! :)
>
> > > On Apr 19, 6:40 pm, Katharina Probst <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Dusty,
>
> > > > what URL did you enter in "Fetch as Googlebot"?  It should work
> > forhttp://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=(or<http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=%...>
> > > > forhttp://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/<
> >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=>#!,
> > > > but that doesn't really apply to your site, because you're not using
> > hash
> > > > fragments).  If you as it to fetchhttp://
> > friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following<
> >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=>/,
> > > > it should give you just the HTML, because that's what the crawler will
> > see
> > > > (and it will then extract the meta tag, construct the
> > _escaped_fragment_ URL
> > > > and fetch that).
>
> > > > Does that do the trick? I hope so.:)
>
> > > > kathrin
>
> > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Dusty <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Thanks so much for your help Kathrin! :)
>
> > > > > However, I've tried these steps and Googlebot is still giving me no
> > > > > love.
>
> > > > > If you go tohttp://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/youcan
> > > > > see I've placed the meta tag in the header.
>
> > > > > Then if you go to
> > > > >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=
> > > > > you can see the results fragment is embedded inline in the static
> > > > > HTML.
>
> > > > > However, if I try "Fetch as Googlebot" (
> >http://www.google.com/support/
> > > > > webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=158587) it shows the original
> > > > > pages HTML, not the _escaped_fragment_ version.
>
> > > > > Any idea what I might have done wrong?
>
> > > > > On Apr 19, 2:02 pm, Katharina Probst <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, that's right!
>
> > > > > > kathrin
>
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Dusty <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > So, if I understand you right, it should work like this?:
>
> > > > > > > 1) I put <meta name="fragment" content="!"> in my static page (ie
> > my
> > > > > > > example:http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/)
> > > > > > > 2) Google will see it, then request
>
> >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/?_escaped_fragment_=
> > > > > > > 3) When my webserver sees _escaped_fragment_ = null, I return my
> > page
> > > > > > > with the results HTML fragment inline instead of through jQuery
> > load.
> > > > > > > 4) Google associates that HTML to
> > > > > > >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/
> > > > > > > in it's index.
>
> > > > > > > Sound correct?
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 19, 11:02 am, Katharina Probst <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > You might use <meta name="fragment" content="!"> in your html
> > page,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > the crawler requests the corresponding _escaped_fragment_= URL,
> > > > > you'll
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > a version without jQuery, where you load the results page
> > fragment
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > static HTML and return that.  Depending on what your server
> > looks
> > > > > like,
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > first has to recognize that it is getting a request for such a
> > URL,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > it will have to produce the results page fragment and put it
> > together
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the static HTML - so everything happens on your server before
> > you
> > > > > return
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > result.
>
> > > > > > > > As long as the resulting DOM is the same as what the user would
> > get,
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > > should be ok.
>
> > > > > > > > kathrin
>
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Dusty <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I've been reading the "Making AJAX Applications Crawlable"
> > specs
> > > > > > > > > (
> >http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-
> > > > > > > > > started.html<
>
> >http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-%0Ast..
> > > > > .>)
> > > > > > > > > and I'm at a loss at how to apply this to my
> > > > > > > > > application.
>
> > > > > > > > > I use jQuery to load an HTML page fragment into a DOM element
> > on a
> > > > > > > > > mostly pure HTML page. It takes a few seconds for the
> > 'results'
> > > > > page
> > > > > > > > > fragment to load from my server, this is why I use AJAX to
> > > > > dynamically
> > > > > > > > > load that content into the static page. Meanwhile the static
> > page
> > > > > > > > > shows a 'throbber' and loading message. How exactly do I
> > apply
> > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > specs in this scenario? I don't use the hash mark in my URLs.
>
> > > > > > > > > The page in question can be seen here:
> > > > > > > > >http://friendorfollow.com/dustyreagan/following/
>
> > > > > > > > > Any pointers or recommendations on how to make the results
> > > > > crawlable?
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > > > >  [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > >  [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > > > > > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > > >  [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > > > > .
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > > > >  [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > > > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > > > To post to this group,...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to