You can still keep your multi-argument constructor, you just also must have a zero arg.
On Apr 22, 7:53 pm, Adam35413 <[email protected]> wrote: > So it appears that the issue is User did not have a 0 argument > constructor. I removed the constructor and everything appears to be > working. I guess I will just have to set all of the members manually > with the setters. Not a problem, just several more lines of code. > > Thanks! > > On Apr 22, 8:24 pm, kozura <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 0 arg constructor? Return value of the RPC uses generics ala > > List<User>? All I can think of, you might also look in the rpc log > > file which is sometimes slightly more helpful. If you can't figure > > out, post the UserService and UserServiceAsync calls and maybe the > > constructors as well. > > > BTW no need to use Integer, can use int, and IsSerializable can just > > be java.io.Serializable now. > > > On Apr 22, 6:09 pm, Adam35413 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am trying to implement a very simple AsyncCallback RPC system, and I > > > believe I have 99% of it correct. I have the UserService and > > > UserServiceAsync on the client side, and the UserServiceImpl on the > > > server side. Through debugging, it appears that the only current > > > issue is the error message I get when the server tries to respond with > > > a list of Users: > > > > "Caused by: com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException: > > > Type 'com.gwt.ca.client.model.User' was not included in the set of > > > types which can be serialized by this..." > > > > However, I am not doing anything crazy in the User model. The model > > > is as follows: > > > > package com.gwt.ca.client.model; > > > > import com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable; > > > > public class User implements IsSerializable { > > > > private Integer id = -1; > > > private String course = null; > > > private String title = null; > > > private String date = null; > > > private String book = null; > > > ... > > > > I have setter and getter methods for all of those variables and a > > > constructor. Why would this not be serializable, and what is the > > > solution to fixing this? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
