Thanks for all the kind words on GWTP. Claude is right in saying that it looks like a hobby project, essentially because it started as such! However, I would say it is well on the way to maturity and, given the current level of involvement of some of the members, I believe it will eventually turn into a serious community-backed and community-maintained project. In fact, I really wish anybody who's interested in building and maintaining a robust MVP framework will consider joining the GWTP developers.
Another plus for GWTP is that I am currently using it on two projects. PuzzleBazar, that has been mentioned here, and another large commercial webapp that decided to go with GWTP as their core component. I'm acting as a consultant on this latest project, and I believe it will guarantee that core GWTP development is "well funded" for a while. I know that a number of other very serious projects are using it, so there is definitely an incentive to keep the project. Looking forward to seeing you use -- and maybe contribute to -- GWTP. Cheers, Philippe On May 13, 2:49 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Greetings folks, > > > > > In order to avoid « reinventing the wheel », I'm looking for a good MVP > > > > (model-view-presenter) framework to use with GWT. > > I was in the same position as you about 2+ weeks ago -- but I've > settled on GWT-Platform myself. > > I was using Objectify for datastore abstraction layer, and the guys > that wrote GWT-Platform also use that library as well. > > I downloaded every sample and every jar for all the candidates you > mentioned -- and none of them really worked "out of the box" -- except > for GWT-Platform. > > And, if you're looking for a good set of examples, they've written > PuzzleBazar -- and you can download that and see how they've used the > framework to do various things. I think that they've done a good job. > > Also, the messages produced by the GWT compiler are *very* informative > as to what its complaining about (far and away the best of the ones I > saw). > > The only ones you mentioned that I didn't look at closely were gwt- > remote-action and handlebars (though I did have a quick look at > handlebars). > > Cheers > Mike > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
