Shamelessly poking this thread to see if I can get any feedback from the dev team.
Cheers Craig On May 25, 1:49 pm, Flemming Boller <[email protected]> wrote: > @Craig > > True I only speak for myself :-) > > I would myself not be to scared to use the incubator stuff myself. We are > using them at work. > this ofcouse means that we also "migrate" our work to the standard > components when they are > included in GWT dist. We have not yet had a lot of problems with that. > > Prototype yes. As I heard on the googleIO they are taken the "lessens > learned from incubator" are rewriting them. But e.g gwt-log code they are > recommending them, which I think is part of the incubator. > > /Flemming > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Craig Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Flemming, > > > I am going to assume that you dont speak for the GWT development team > > due to the lack of any real detail in your message :) but in all > > seriousness, I would really like some kind of indication from the dev > > team on their stance on this kind of UI control development. There > > seems to be a definite gap to be filled between the solid GWT base > > layout functionality, and the often invasive, all-or-nothing 3rd party > > widget libraries. > > > AFAICT the incubator is not a sound choice to base anything serious > > on. We are sitting at the moment with code derived from incubator > > tables that we falsely assumed would be evolved into first class GWT > > components. From what I can see, they were essentially prototypes that > > have been thrown away. > > > Cheers > > Craig > > > On May 25, 12:44 am, fboller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > @Craig -> Yes that is a nice one :-) Currently however I think you > > > will have to suffice with the incubator version though. > > > > /Flemming > > > > On 24 Maj, 15:15, Craig Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That's correct. The entire table is a static block. The more useful > > > > table control is one that has a fixed header (ideally with resizable > > > > columns and sorting controls) and a scrollable data area. > > > > > Cheers > > > > Craig > > > > > On May 24, 6:29 pm, Flemming Boller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I guess that the header is not fixed in this example? > > > > > > I mean that when you use the scroll, the header moves together with > > the > > > > > data, so > > > > > the header is not fixed. > > > > > > /Flemming > > > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 24 mai, 04:52, Craig Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > The new CellTable and PagingListView/ListView programming model > > is > > > > > > > really nice, great work guys!! but the glaring omission I can see > > in > > > > > > > the M1 drop is a table that has a scrolling data area and a fixed > > > > > > > header/footer, as opposed to a paging table. > > > > > > > I haven't (yet) looked at the code, but it's already there from > > what > > > > > > I'm seeing: > > > > > >http://gwt-bikeshed.appspot.com/Expenses.html > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > > > > > [email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
