Hi George,
absolutely - the other browsers are fine with simple DOM manipulation.
Inspired by the (a little bit outdated) benchmark [1], I changed my
code to join arrays instead of strings:
--------------
void attachImages(...) {
final JsArrayString array = JavaScriptObject.createArray().cast();
for (...) {
boolean flag = ...;
array.push(flag ? "<img src='images/a.gif' style='left:" : "<img
src='images/b.gif' style='top:");
array.push(String.valueOf(i));
array.push("em'/>");
}
div1.setHTML(array.join(""));
}
--------------
This also only calls setHTML() once at the end of the loop.
Does anybody see possibilities for optimization - either improving
performance or resulting in cleaner code?
[1]: http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html
On May 28, 12:31 am, George Georgovassilis
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> I think, especially with respect to IE, the fastest way is still to
> construct a string and assign it to div's innerHTML... provided that
> you can find an intelligent and fast way to create that string, as IE
> (at least prior to 8) has a notoriously slow string concatenation.
>
> On May 27, 9:33 pm, Chris Lercher <[email protected]> wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
