I'll go with Stefan here.

MVC implies that the server handles much of the view - with a GWT
application the server is reduced to a glorified DAO. All you really
need is integrate services from the backend into the frontend. What we
really missing is something like RMI for the browser - GWT's RPC is as
good as it gests for this purpose and and libraries like the GWT-SL
allow you to directly publish Spring managed POJOs as services over
RPC into the client.

On Jun 13, 1:59 pm, Stefan Bachert <stefanbach...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spring MVC does not fit to GWT at all.
>
> GWT considers the browser to be a thin/rich client, and the server to
> be the data source/model
>
> Spring MVC considers the browser to be an ultra thin client (something
> like an x-server), and considers the "server" to be a fat client,
> where presentation, business logic and persistence live.
> Spring MVC is an artefact of the pre-AJAX-era.
>
> Use GWT for real application (RIA) and use Spring MVC for hyperlinked
> documents.
>
> In a complex website you may switch between real applications and
> hyperlinked documents, so you will find both in one site.
> But it makes NO sense to drive GWT with Spring MVC.
>
> When you look at Spring Roo and its GWT support, it comes without
> Spring MVC (Spring Roo can generate Spring MVC controller but without
> GWT). It is "either or"
>
> Stefan Bacherthttp://gwtworld.de
>
> On Jun 8, 5:32 pm, ezamur <eza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all...
>
> > I am new to GWT - had some contact with it earlier but not enough to
> > say I am confident with it.
>
> > My task is to investigate this technology and pair it with Spring
> > framework. There are a lot of tutorials explaining how this can be
> > done, but what is bothering me is I can't decide which approach to
> > choose. For example, I've seen one using Spring's MVC (like this 
> > one:http://technophiliac.wordpress.com/2008/08/24/giving-gwt-a-spring-in-...),
> > but also other where integration is done without it 
> > (e.g.http://code.google.com/p/gwt-spring-starter-app/)
>
> > I am afraid to miss something important by choosing one of these
> > approaches and possibly lose some of Web MVC functionalities that
> > might be needed later or end up in dead end street using it.
>
> > I would be grateful if anyone explained me what are the pros and cons
> > of these approaches from practical point of view - is there a need for
> > DispatcherServlet and Controllers while having GWT and its RPC
> > mechanism.
>
> > Thanks in advance.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to