On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:43 PM, rakesh wagh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Infact my question is, why xml? why not yaml or json? > Because HTML is de-facto XML? And given UiBinder is mix of HTML + the UI-definition the choice has been obvious, IMO. Not speaking of data-structure definition, format validation, transformations - i.e. overall support. I don't really see single reason for using anything else. Rakesh Wagh > > On Jun 20, 6:23 pm, spierce7 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does using the UI Binder provide any benefits? I watched some of the I/ > > O conference, and it seemed like they made reference that the UI > > Binder using the browsers native rendering engine (or something like > > that), and it being a lot faster, but they didn't really specify > > whether that was the layout panels, or using the ui binder. > > > > What are the benefits to using the UIBinder, and where can I learn to > > use it? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
