> The majority of what GWT can do can be done by a good web > developer/designer...
Of course, but is it done as fast ? And is it easily maintainable ? For guys like me, who are not so good at HTML and JS but master Java and OOD, it's not a crutch, it's a high-powered exo-skeleton packed with a light saber. On 12 juil, 16:06, DaveC <[email protected]> wrote: > The majority of what GWT can do can be done by a good web developer/ > designer... but what GWT is good at is all the compile time > optimisations - when you're trying to squeeze every last bit of > performance out of of your app... and if you only/have to write Java. > > It is a crutch IMHO, probably quite a good one though ;o) - but a > crutch no less. > > On Jul 12, 2:57 pm, nino ekambi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > For me i think GWT is the future. > > It s just a genius way to write desktop type web application. > > > 2010/7/9 mk <[email protected]> > > > > Do you guys think that GWT will the most widely used framework in > > > future ( or there will be mix of other frameworks in future. If yes > > > than which frameworks). > > > > I am little worried that why GWT is not adopted at a rate I would have > > > thought for last 4 yrs. why why... > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > > [email protected]> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
