I think the use of either will penalize the performance in client side, String should be faster.
- Manolo On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM, guandalino <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, GWT provides JRE emulation for both StringBuffer and > StringBuilder. The Java API says that in single threaded environments > the preferred choice is to use StringBuilder as it is faster. I also > remember to have read that browsers way to work is single threaded. > > So I'm wondering why and when one should use StringBuffer at all. Can > you clarify? > > Thank you. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
