Are you serious? If you are *creating the buttons dynamically* and you can declare the clickHandler as a field it will be faster cause you will be avoiding the handler instantiation every time...
but I don't think that choice will have a performance impact.. 2010/7/13 cody <[email protected]> > private final Button button; > private final ClickHandler clickHandler; > > public MyClass(){ > > > //Code 1 > button.addClickHandler(new > com.google.gwt.event.dom.client.ClickHandler() { > public void > onClick(com.google.gwt.event.dom.client.ClickEvent > event) { > Window.alert("msg"); > } > }); > > //Code 2 > clickHandler=new > com.google.gwt.event.dom.client.ClickHandler() { > > public void > onClick(com.google.gwt.event.dom.client.ClickEvent > event) { > Window.alert("msg"); > } > }; > button.addClickHandler(clickHandler); > } > > Which code is better for performance ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- http://gwtupdates.blogspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
