It looks like this is already fixed for 2.1. Do you plan on releasing a 2.0.5 version? If not, it probably doesn't make sense to fix it.
Justin On Jul 16, 10:18 pm, David Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > I went ahead and uploaded gwt-soyc-vis-2.0.4.jar because it is still > distributed in the GWT SDK download. Kindly log the plugin issue > athttp://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT. > > Thank you, > /dmc > > On Jul 16, 5:11 pm, "[email protected]" > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks. But... unfortunately, it looks like the exclusion of gwt-soyc- > > vis means that 2.0.4 can't work with version 1.2 of the gwt-maven- > > plugin. I understand gwt-soyc-vis is deprecated, but could you post it > > anyway? > > > I can't post it to another repository because the artifact I'm working > > on is destined for central and needs the whole transitive closure to > > be available from central. For the same reason, I can't depend upon a > > SNAPSHOT version of the gwt-maven-plugin. > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > > On Jul 16, 4:12 pm, David Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Done. > > > > Announcement > > > here:http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/07/gwt-204-now-available-in... > > > > /dmc > > > > On Jul 16, 1:04 pm, "[email protected]" > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > David- > > > > I see that gwt-user and gwt-dev are up on central, but are you posting > > > > gwt-servlet as well? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > > On Jul 14, 10:18 pm, David Chandler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hangtight,folks,we'reon it. Ashasbeennotedin thisthread,GWT > > > > > itself is not built withmaven, so it's not a 100% automated process > > > > > to push tomavencentral. Butwe'reworking hard to getgwt-user-2.0.4 > > > > > andgwt-dev-2.0.4 uploaded by Friday and to make deployment tomaven > > > > > central a part of future releases. > > > > > > David ChandlerGWTDeveloper Relations > > > > > Atlanta, GA USA > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:15 pm, David Vree <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for that. > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 6:37 pm, monkeyboy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nice. From 23 to 37 stars in less than a day. > > > > > > > > On Jul 14, 9:09 am, monkeyboy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Kasper Hansen > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I would also wish that Google would takeMavenmore seriously. > > > > > > > > > I can > > > > > > > > > only recommend all that agree to star the issues > > > > > > > > > regardingMavenin > > > > > > > > > the bug tracker. > > > > > > > > > Here it is (the issue > > > > > > > > regardingMaven):http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4673 > > > > > > > > > There are only 23 stars so far.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
