I always use the "#!meep" syntax, which when the google crawler sees it interprets as ?_escape_fragment. I seem to recall reading in the google documentation that this is the correct way to do it.
-Rob On Jul 17, 8:12 pm, darkflame <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for both your help I'm almost there now. > The $param= $_GET['_escaped_fragment_']; worked fine, now the rest of > my php works. > > One other query, however; What should the links generated by this php > file return? > If my normal code set history to something like "#meep" (which would > now be "#!meep") should the static page have that link set to "#meep" > "#!meep" "?meep" or even "?_escape_fragment_" > > I assume I could use #! that googles crawler would automatically > change to "?_escape_fragment_" but wouldn't it be better to give it > directly? or would that not associate the links correctly? Of course, > if I stuck to just using ? then it would make the site browsable for > people with JavaScript turned of too. > > -Thomas > > On Jul 14, 10:05 am, RPB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi darkflame, > > > Not sure I fully understand your second question, but you should be > > able to just use $param= $_GET['_escaped_fragment_']; and then process > > the code as normal. > > Also, the 'Fetch with googlebot' tool in Webmaster tools is very > > helpful, showing you exactly what google will actually be crawling. > > > Cheers, > > Robwww.yournextread.com > > > On Jul 11, 12:07 am, darkflame <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > a) As my server doesn't support server-side java, I'll be using php to > > > generate the static/snapshot pages. How close do they have to be to > > > the proper/GWT ones? Is it good enough if the text and links are > > > exactly same....but not the images/layout? I dont want to be accused > > > of spoofing, but replicating the layout exact will prove a lot of > > > work. > > > > b) Is there an easy way to parse the new urls? I used to use just GET > > > in PHP to retrieve each expected key/value, but this doesnt work now > > > that _escaped_fragment_ has been added at the start. Is there a > > > recommended method? or do I just code my own parser? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
