Thanks cokol and Stefan I expect cache from GET
On Jul 21, 8:07 am, Stefan Bachert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > what do you expect from using GET instead of POST? > > Basically POST could definitely transfer many bytes, GET may have a > limit. (In the past they talked about 2K limit for an url, which may > no more apply) > It is more effort necessary to do a CSRF/XSRF with POST, so I consider > POST somewhat more secure. > (However, I consider most recent GWT-RPC to be save against CSRF/XSRF) > > Stefan Bachert > http::/gwtworld.de > > due to recent cases, I am sorry, I won't do free personal support. > inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome. > > On 20 Jul., 18:51, mk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Is there a way to make AJAX async call of type GET ( instead of POST). > > > (RequestBuilder is ok but still is there a easier way)- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
