I still have some with IE7 lol At least it's lesser than with IE6 :D
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:28 AM, nacho <[email protected]> wrote: > Is so easy and free to install FF in any computer, that i don't know > why developers must keep loosing time with IE6. > > When someone's want's a web development we must say "Ok, but i will > not do it IE6 compliant", Google doesn't losses any more time in that, > why should we? > > I don't loose time in that. I have no more hair to pull of my head :D > > On 23 jul, 10:28, Stefan Bachert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi to all, > > > > There is no need for jsni. > > > > http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.0/com/google/g... > > > > Window.Navigator.getNavigator() > > > > should do the job. > > > > a link to the download page(s) of modern browser may be useful, too. > > > > Stefan Bachert > > http::/gwtworld.de > > > > Inquiries for professional GWT support are welcome. > > I am sorry, I won't do free personal support. > > > > On 23 Jul., 10:07, Sven <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Magnus, > > > > > I do it like this: > > > > > public static native String getUserAgent() /*-{ > > > return navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase(); > > > }-*/; > > > > > public void onModuleLoad() { > > > .... > > > if (MyMainClass.getUserAgent().contains("msie 6.0")) { > > > HTML message = new HTML("Please notice: as you > are using an old > > > version of your browser, some functionalities of this site may be > > > limited."); > > > message.setStylePrimaryName("info"); > > > RootPanel.get("info").add( message ); > > > } > > > .... > > > } > > > > > The warning is displayed on top of the page. You may want to have a > > > look atwww.dotvoting.orgwhereI've implemented it. I noticed that > > > not only many transparencies of my icons are currently not rendered > > > well, but also some layouting is wrong. However, as the main functions > > > should work, I thought adding a message for IE 6 and focusing on IE 7, > > > 8, FF, Chrome, Safari, ... is more appropriate than making it perfect > > > for IE 6. > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > Sven > > > > > On 23 Jul., 04:21, Magnus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brett, > > > > > > ok, but BTW: How can one do this, i. e. determine the browser version > > > > with GWT? > > > > > > Magnus > > > > > > On Jul 22, 8:03 pm, Brett Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I think it looks classy to display a note for IE6 users that says > something > > > > > along the lines of "unfortunately our website no longer supports > IE6, click > > > > > here to learn how to upgrade" > > > > > > > I think plenty of people have no idea what browser version they are > using. > > > > > They may know the difference between IE and Firefox, but not what > version > > > > > number it is. If a site doesn't work, they'll just say "must be > because my > > > > > computer is old" and forget about it. So, tell them what they can > do to fix > > > > > it... > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM, charlie <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Agreed. It's been the bane of web developers existence for far > too long. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Christian Goudreau < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Let's drop IE6 and IE7 support, I think it's time anyway for > that. > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Isaac Truett < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> GWT doesn't promise to make your application look the same on > all > > > > > >>> browsers. It does try its very best to make sure that the JS it > produces > > > > > >>> functions the same across browsers, and doesn't leave any nasty > side > > > > > >>> effects, leak memory, or anything like that. > > > > > > > >>> There may be some cases where GWT will leverage CSS "tricks" on > each > > > > > >>> browser to achieve a result (although I can't think of any such > cases off > > > > > >>> the top of my head), but that doesn't mean that GWT will take > steps to > > > > > >>> ensure that all of your CSS is magically transformed into > something that > > > > > >>> works on any browser. For one thing, that's out of scope, and > for another it > > > > > >>> isn't possible. Some things in CSS just aren't supported, > especially in > > > > > >>> older browsers. > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Magnus < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > > > > >>>> sorry for repeating: > > > > > > > >>>> I thought that the promise of GWT was that one never ever has > to deal > > > > > >>>> with such problems anymore? > > > > > > > >>>> Why are we discussing about wether to spent time in supporting > IE6 > > > > > >>>> while the GWT compiler should do this? > > > > > > > >>>> Magnus > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > > >>>> Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > >>>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > > >>>> [email protected]. > > > > > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > >>>> [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > [email protected]> > > > > > >>>> . > > > > > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups > > > > > >>> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > > > > > >>> . > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > >>> [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > [email protected]> > > > > > >>> . > > > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> Christian Goudreau > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups > > > > > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > >> [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > [email protected]> > > > > > >> . > > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > <charlie/> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups > > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > [email protected]> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- Christian Goudreau -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
