Hi there,

I got to that point that I need to improve my RPC transfer speed - due
to big data - and I tried the com.google.gwt.rpc.RPC.
It's much, much faster -- but it's buggy. In dev.mode I got from 45
sec (classic approach) to 5sec with deRPC approach). But when I tried
to run it in the web.mode I get the following error:


Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be
cast to java.lang.Boolean
        at com.google.gwt.rpc.server.CommandSerializationUtil$TypeAccessor
$1.set(CommandSerializationUtil.java:106)
        at com.google.gwt.rpc.server.CommandSerializationUtil
$TypeAccessor.set(CommandSerializationUtil.java:413)
        at com.google.gwt.rpc.server.CommandServerSerializationStreamReader
$Visitor.endVisit(CommandServerSerializationStreamReader.java:121)
        at com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.SetCommand.traverse(SetCommand.java:
64)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.doAccept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
320)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.accept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
42)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.doAccept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
312)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.accept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
35)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.InstantiateCommand.traverse(InstantiateCommand.java:
55)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.doAccept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
320)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.client.ast.RpcCommandVisitor.accept(RpcCommandVisitor.java:
42)
        at
com.google.gwt.rpc.server.CommandServerSerializationStreamReader.readObject(CommandServerSerializationStreamReader.java:
319)
        at
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.core.java.util.Map_CustomFieldSerializerBase.deserialize(Map_CustomFieldSerializerBase.java:
37)
        at
com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.core.java.util.HashMap_CustomFieldSerializer.deserialize(HashMap_CustomFieldSerializer.java:
31)
        ... 46 more


It's shame that this fast RPC serialization method isn't completed,
and it's in still experimental status. So, can you tell when can we
expect a stable version of this code, please ???

Cheers!
Sorinel Cristescu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to