HI akhil, ZK does not have a 2nd compilation step into JS (and can thus use all of Java on both sides). However, you have ongoing client-server communication (speed!), you don't have the optimizations google offers for your and from what I remember from using ZK, the framework is by far not as straightforward: with GWT, you add a widget to a root panel and just program the UI; with ZK, you have binding declarations, event / update issues, ... At least I (but it may be me) had much more trouble and many more problems to solve before the ZK logic was in place (e.g. augment table contents). Finally, you re-use the best practices long established in "traditional" UI programming and this is where RIA also aims for when using GWT.
So for a quick and optimized entry into the subject of RIA - and also for quickly implementing larger stuff with a stable framework, I'd use GWT. I've been using it for a while now and it turned out to be a very solid ground. (Maybe ZK would have done the same when I'd have followed it further - all starting issues can surely be solved there as well; however, I've never regretted choosing GWT). Hope this helps - best Regards Sebastian On 31 Jul., 12:37, matthieu vidal <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding the ZK license and the community arround it, I don't think. > > On 31 juil, 07:41, akhil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > pls help me to decide isZK > > > ZK better than GWT..? > > > Regards, > > Akhil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
