We're developing a "web 2.0" style app with gwt too, using the UiBinder to construct our "panels" and the GQuery API to interact with them ( that can be learned more about in here http://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/ ).
Is there any chance that the GQuery will be included on the GWT core? On Aug 12, 9:11 am, Uberto Barbini <[email protected]> wrote: > We're developing a "web 2.0" style app with gwt. > I cannot post url here (not yet) but the goal is something like > basecamp or twitter, nothing to do with desktop style widget (also > cool ones like vaadin). > > Our experience so far: > 1. UiBinder is much better than try to create our own widget by code. > 2. it's still much harder to get good looking results with GWT than > with plain html with Jquery. > 3. overall gwt is worth the pain 10 times if you add snappiness of > resulting application, debug, and code reuse. > > about #2 there is absolutely no documentation on css and uibinder from > a designer point of view. > For example any half decent designer nowadays would use div and span > to create nice layout, while all gwt panels are still using nested > tables. > > cheers > Uberto > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Marcelo Magno <[email protected]> wrote: > > Worth to mention their debug mode where you can find design problems. > > > Try to click on the "analyse layouts" button: > >http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/?debug=true > > > so +1 for Vaadin > > > Marcelo Magno > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Steve Wart <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Vaadin looks good, and it makes sense to keep the client-side load > >> light, especially with touch devices becoming prevalent. > > >> But it doesn't seem great (so far) for touch UI work, and I think the > >> "everything in Java" mantra is sub-optimal. While Vaadin has hooks for > >> CSS and hand-crafted JavaScript, my ideal toolset would better support > >> the developers who can make these technologies sing. > > >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Kevin Qiu <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > +1 for Vaadin. > >> > Their widgets are very polished and professional. GXT and SmartGWT are > >> > fine > >> > but they're too desktop-looky, not Web2.0 looky... > > >> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, marius.andreiana > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> Hi Chi, > > >> >> On Aug 9, 10:23 pm, Chi H <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > * Pagination is the standard solution to the 'large number of > >> >> > entities' problem. However, there is a usability cost to pagination. > >> >> > It would be really nice to get rid of the pagination and just use a > >> >> > scrollbar. If you used the approach of SlickGrid (http:// > >> >> > wiki.github.com/mleibman/SlickGrid/), where you only rendered what > >> >> > was > >> >> > visible on the screen, you can render large numbers entities without > >> >> > the need for pagination. > > >> >> How will search engines index all the content in this case? > > >> >> The SlickGrid widget doesn't work at all if JS is not enabled. > > >> >> Thanks > > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> Groups > >> >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> >> To post to this group, send email to > >> >> [email protected]. > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> [email protected]. > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
