On 08/12/2010 03:24 PM, Jeff Chimene wrote: > On 08/12/2010 02:23 PM, Kevin Qiu wrote: >> Thanks for taking the time. Although it's not clear what action you put >> in the timer and what the timer is supposed to do > > It's a "processing occurring" timer. I think I mentioned it earlier, so > I didn't remove it from the example. > >> (IncrementalCommand is executed by DeferredCommand.CommandExecutor >> and it already has a timer with timeslice set to 100ms). > > Right. > >> Also, I suppose you need to reset the "busy" flag in the callback of >> the asynchronous calls. > > Yes. You already had that bit sussed. The case statement asynchronously
synchronously > drains the command queue, while providing a structure that synchronously > resolves to a "final" command step. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
