GWT is used in LOTS of Google products nowadays, and I'd bet that they're keen to use it more. They clearly love it, so I reckon it's here to stay.
On Aug 6, 7:24 pm, Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's important to remember that GWT was used to rebuild the > AdWords UI, which is the primary driver of revenue for Google. I'm > hoping that this will keep GWT top of mind for Googlers for a long > time to come. > > Also, AFAIK, the mobile Gmail app is also built with GWT. > > -- > Arthur Kalmenson > > > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:10 AM, hummh <hhu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would expect an official announcement from Google, what impact that > > decision has to the future of GWT. On the one side, I see many > > companies switching from classic server based web frameworks to GWT. > > On the other side one of the major innovation drivers of GWT is gone. > > So the questions are: what are the long term plans of Google for GWT? > > Are there plans to use it in other Google applications (would be the > > best sign that Google itself believes in GWT)? Are the companies > > investments in GWT future proof? ... > > > On 5 Aug., 17:57, Chris Ramsdale <cramsd...@google.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for all of the responses, even the criticism is highly > >> beneficial. In regard to theWaveannouncement, we're certainly sad, > >> but do realize that many features (Code Splitting, SOYC, another spin > >> on MVP+GWT) were born out of the experiment. Where possible, we're > >> definitely interested in pulling in some of theWavefunctionality > >> into GWT (widgets obviously being top of mind). > > >> Re: Instantiations, we're extremely excited to have the team joining. > >> Right now, we're heads down integrating the team and the products, but > >> we'll keep the GWT community posted when we have more information. > > >> -- Chris > > >> On Aug 5, 12:04 am, Steve Wart <st...@wart.ca> wrote: > > >> > Holy smokes, first SpringSource acquires GemStone, now this. > > >> > Did someone in Silicon Valley suddenly figure out that Smalltalk is > >> > cool? :) > > >> > FWIW, I've had far more success getting JSON to work with Smalltalk > >> > and GWT than we ever had with 13 years of Java and XML. Coincidence? > > >> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Shawn Brown <big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> I just worry about GWT itself. Google may kill GWT some day. Our > >> > >> project heavy uses it:(. > > >> > > Not anytime soon I imagine. > > >> > > Look Google just acquired instantiations which makes the gwtdesigner. > > >> > >http://www.instantiations.com/ > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. > >> > > To post to this group, send email to > >> > > google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> > > For more options, visit this group > >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
