> This is easy to do... I even like more the old widgets then the new Cell
> widget for css customization.
Did you try it.... ?
Because it's hard, and in many cases, espcially with dependent styles
not possible!
Have a look as this issue and the related topic...:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4903

I would love to hear how you do it?

GWT is busy with many bugs, but it's all a mather of priorities...
I am also sometimes frustrated about some bugs not being fixed... but
that's the way it is...: it's open source and it's all a mather of
priorities...
I always manage to work around it, or fix them in some other way...
About the GWT future: still no worries and confident of a robust GWT
future with many awesome AJAX app's.


On Aug 26, 2:25 pm, Christian Goudreau <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Didn't read everything but:
>
> > How come I can not use CssResource with the standard widgets of GWT ?
>
> This is easy to do... I even like more the old widgets then the new Cell
> widget for css customization.
>
> And as far sa I can tell, a big majority of the bug I've seen so far are
> often because the user don't use GWT in the right way. I'm not denying that
> there's bug, but the big business app I've worked on never had issue with
> GWT itself.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:40 AM, stuckagain <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Since I get no response from the GWT dev-team on reported bugs I am
> > beginning to wonder about the future of GWT. It looks like stability
> > of the existing features is not very high on the list. I've heard
> > excuses in all the previous release that you guys were going to sort
> > out long-standing bugs after the next major release ... but years have
> > passed now and the collection of open and even new issues is going in
> > the wrong direction.
>
> > So I have to ask the obvious question:
> > Is Google going to abandon it now that Google Wave has been axed ?
>
> > The focus of 2.1 seems to be fast app development for enterprise apps,
> > which is very good... but one of the major requirements in enterprises
> > when selecting a toolkit is the maturity and stablity of the toolkits,
> > how much support do you get, how fast are bugs fixed ... etc... right
> > now I find it harder every day to sell GWT for newer projects.
>
> > From that perspective I'm not that sure that I would want to rely on
> > the Spring-Roo and Data aware widgets.
>
> > When we report bugs on other opensource projects (like struts in the
> > past or eclipse and many others) the new bug reports are quickly
> > detected and you get some basic feedback... right now the issue
> > tracker seems like you guys are using the SUN bug database. There are
> > still important bugs open from the beginning years of Java!
>
> > One other remark about dogfood:
> > How come I can not use CssResource with the standard widgets of GWT ?
> > They all rely on primary stylename and style dependent names to switch
> > states ... which makes it impossible to optimize the CSS with
> > CssResource. Are we really supposed to write our own widgets ? Writing
> > our own widgets is not too hard, but I hate it when I can not even use
> > the most fundamental UI widgets.
>
> > Again: I'm sounding very negative above, but that is just because I
> > care about the success of GWT! I want it to succeed but it needs to
> > grow up.
>
> > David
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> Christian Goudreauwww.arcbees.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to