Hi, How can i get the source code for http://gwt-bikeshed.appspot.com/Expenses.html
<http://gwt-bikeshed.appspot.com/Expenses.html>Regards Deepak On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 27 août, 15:31, Gilles B <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using GWT 2.0 there no pleasant grid controls provided (compared to > > classic SmartGWT, GWT-Ext...). So I include the FixedWidthFlexTable, > > FlexTable, ScrollTable... updated widgets from google gwt-incubator > > project. This is not perfect but these controls provide fixed header > > and footer (during scroll), a basic column sorting, etc. > > > > What about these old widgets in new 2.1 version? Documentation says > > "new GWT's Data Presentation Widgets" but there is no detail. Is it > > possible to try and replace the old incubator classes using a new > > Widget in the current Milestone ? is there some documentation > > available or is it too soon to try it ? > > See https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+nGKCcZzyA > The JavaDoc can be found at > > http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.1/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/package-summary.html > (at the time of writing, they still represent something between M2 and > M3, I hope they'll update them soon; if you use Maven, then you'll > find the up-to-date ones as maven artifacts) > A live example can be seen here > http://gwt-bikeshed.appspot.com/Expenses.html > > Note that the CellTable doesn't (yet?) support fixed header/footer/ > columns, and you'll have to provide your own "sortable header" (the > code for the sample is in the SVN repo, so you should be able to copy > their headers and sorting handling) > > That being said, I'm constantly fighting against sortable grids, as > they IMO generally are a sign of a lack of good search support (that's > of course not always the case: sorting items by price to be able to > compare them is a valid use case for sortable grids, but it doesn't > mean it should be implemented as a clickable header and/or generic > "sortable table widget"). > As for fixed headers, I think in many cases there shouldn't be any > header at all, and the row data be understandable without them. But > again, there are valid use cases for headers (and fixed headers really > should be easier to achieve in browsers!), and I have no doubt that > you have valid reasons for searching such widgets. > (I often cite GMail as a good example of both "no need for sort" and > "no need for headers") > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
