Well i tried mvp4g in late 2009, GWTP and GUIT were not available...
only gwt-presenter.
So i made proof of concept with both frameworks and i really like the
way mvp4g did. Simple configuration, annotation facilities for
binding, splitability, nice support... and i like the fact that there
is no 1 million concepts and features that i won't use (as I prefer
'raw' GWT than getting into swartGwt and GXT for same reasons)

On 30 août, 21:07, Jeff Larsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your responses they've been a huge help.
>
> I noticed a lot of people using gwtp and no mention of MVP4G. What
> made your decision to go with gwtp instead of mvp4g?
>
> On Aug 29, 2:14 pm, Ikari <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Gin and Guice for dependency injection. GWT-presenter as realization
> > of MVP pattern, GWT-dispatch for client-server communication. So far
> > that's fine.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to