I implement the testing appliation without any traffic. It's a pure page with a label and a flex table only. The label is updated by a Timer every 300ms with current date and time.
That's all. On Oct 19, 8:18 am, Didier DURAND <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Did you check for any traffic with the server (via a Firefox plugin > like Firebug or equiv) > > Do you see requests from client to server ? > > regards > didier > > On Oct 19, 11:20 am, Jason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Any idea? Many Thanks! > > > On Oct 14, 4:46 am, Jason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > I am debugging a GWT application which is very slow. I tried to > > > isloate the problem and get below result: > > > > A simple panel with a label and a flextable. > > > The label is updated with current time every 300 ms. > > > The flextable is filled with static data but never update. > > > > When the flextable become bigger, the cpu usage increase > > > significantly. > > > For example, with 3600 grids, the cpu usage is 9.9% > > > with 36000 grids, the cpu usage is 80%. > > > > If I stop the label updating, the cpu usage is zero. > > > > I dont understand why the size of the flextable will affect the cpu > > > usage. It should only consume time when create. After creation is > > > complete, it should take no cpu resource at all. > > > > Does it means updating the label will lead to the flextable refresh > > > too? > > > > GWT version: 2.0.3 > > > Browser: Firefox > > > CPU: ARM, 400Mhz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
