Thanks Harald for reminding me. I actually used priti for some xml work. Not JSON. Yes, i think this also is a good alternative.
Thanks, Subhro. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Harald Pehl <harald.p...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Feel free to take a look at Piriti (http://code.google.com/p/piriti/). > It's a JSON / XML mapper for GWT using annotations and defered > binding. Using Piriti you can have real POJOs on the client side. > References and inheritance is supported. I'm about to release version > 0.6 soon which will add support for JSONPath (http://goessner.net/ > articles/JsonPath/ <http://goessner.net/%0Aarticles/JsonPath/>) and > private fields. > > - Harald > > On 26 Okt., 21:25, Subhrajyoti Moitra <subhrajyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "All this led me to write a Generator which inspects my models ("real" > > beans) and emits JSON mapping code handling simple properties, object > > graphs and collections."=> > > This is very interesting. Can u give some hints as how to go about > writing > > this Generator? > > > > Thanks, > > Subhro. > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Sebastian Beigel <sebast...@beigel.de > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Of course, if your really want Product as a "real" bean, and a > List<?> > > > > instead of a JsArray<?>, you can copy things around (see below); but > > > > really I believe overlay types are much more readable than anything > > > > using com.google.gwt.json.* classes. > > > > > I used to use overlay type heavily (returning JSON from a Spring > > > MVC/Jackson backend) and it worked quite well. Although I found it > > > quite limiting to be unable to model "real" class hierarchies (JSOs > > > must not be subclassed). I really do this a lot on the server side. I > > > also really like to use the enhanced for loop for Lists and just do a > > > new Foo() instead of some tedious Foo.create(). Last but not least I > > > don't have a "Generate getters/setters" in Eclipse for my JSOs :) > > > > > All this led me to write a Generator which inspects my models ("real" > > > beans) and emits JSON mapping code handling simple properties, object > > > graphs and collections. That way I can work with real beans and > > > collections of beans in my (business) code and do the mapping from/to > > > JSON in my service/DAO layer (still sending/retrieving JSON to/from my > > > backend). > > > > > Sebastian > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com><google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > cr...@googlegroups.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
