Thanks John. Would another work-around be to call the ListDataProvider's setList method for each change to the tree?
On Nov 2, 2:23 am, John LaBanca <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a bug in CellTreeNodeView where it always assumes new data starts > at index 0, which of course is not true if the data is being appended. That > explains why it works when you insert at index 0. Another workaround is to > populate the ListDataProvider before creating the CellTree (if that is an > option for your app). > > I'm working on a fix that will be in the next GWT release. > > Thanks, > John LaBanca > [email protected] > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:17 AM, rahul vijay shinde < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > These mail are been wrongly marked to me > > > Please avoid. > > > Regards > > Rahul Shinde > > > On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:53:51 +0530 David Pinn wrote > > > >I don't know you you've screwed up; but if you have, so have I. > > > >I too have been seeing very strange event-handling behaviour, with > > >values being passed to getNodeInfo that are not for the node clicked > > >on. Using your trick with .add(0, Object) made my problem go away too. > > >Right now I'm really happy because it is just that little bit less > > >likely that we are both stupid. maybe. > > > >On Nov 1, 3:04 am, decitrig <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> This problem is a bit tricky to describe; forgive me. I have a cell > > >> tree where nodes are added programmatically by doing a getList().add() > > >> on a ListDataProvider field. However, I found that using > > >> the .add(Object) method would do strange things to the ordering, i.e. > > >> the node *rendered* as "Item 1" would be passed as *value* "Item 2" to > > >> getNodeInfo(), and thus it looked like Item 1 got Item 2's children. > > > >> The really strange thing is that if I do .add(0, Object), then > > >> everything works fine. > > > >> The actual code can be found here: > >http://bitbucket.org/slide_rule/umd-code-review/src/tip/src/edu/umd/r... > > > >> I just want to have list operations reflected in the tree, is this a > > >> bug or have I just screwed this up somehow? > > > >> -- > > >> rwsims > > > >-- > > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > >For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.co...> > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
