There aren't any performance implications, it only can get faster I guess. You would need to wrap these Closure objects into JavaScriptObject, which is very tedious and time consuming thing to do, and not really rewarding, because those widgets are realy simple. IMHO, there is great overlap between GWT and Closure, there is a widget library, and there is a compiler. I think you should decide to either use GWT or Closure.
With GWT, you benefit from rich language semantics of Java, while Closure is the "lightweight" approach. To make a wise decision you would have to sum your expectations on the library, compare Closure's and GWT's, consider language differences etc. Closure lacks MVP framework, in GWT you have several to choose from. On Dec 10, 8:23 am, karthik reddy <[email protected]> wrote: > Given than closure library has a plethora of UI elements(all the nice > UI elements one could see across various google products like Google > docs, maps, gmail etc), would it not be worthwhile to use them in GWT > using JSNI. Has anyone tried this ?? > > Any performance implications ??? > > thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
