Yes. I agree it will be optimized out but the problem is I need to use
a class thats only on the server. So the compiler says the class is
not in a module.
On Dec 21, 1:43 pm, "a...@mechnicality.com" <a...@mechnicality.com>
wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in, but you could use:
>
> public void yourMethod(...) {
> if (!GWT.isClient()) {
> everything in your method.
> }
>
> }
>
> The complier should then ignore everything inside the conditional.
>
> However, it seems a bit of a kludge to exclude the whole method. Another
> option is sub-classing and
> have a server-side version which is a sub-class of your shared class - I've
> done that before and
> IMHO its a bit more elegant.
>
> HTH
>
> Alan
>
> On 12/21/2010 10:36 AM, kevin wrote:
>
> > I was hoping to do it within a class.
>
> > For instance, say have method a() only available on the server.
>
> > On Dec 21, 12:41 pm, Mauro Bertapelle<mauro.bertape...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> In the<source> tag of the module XML file you can specify the
> >> subpackage associated with the classes you want GWT to compile.
> >> You can even exclude some particular classes using a pattern based
> >> filter:http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideOrgan...
>
> --
> Alan Chaney
> CTO and Founder, Mechnicality, Inc.www.mechnicality.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
