Here is the payload from both the 1st approach and the 2nd approach
(they were identical payloads):
{"O":[{"C":5,"T":"x.x.FileDataProxy","R":"1"},
{"O":"UPDATE","T":"x.x.FileProxy","S":"Ii1EWVRoRUVfU2VxWGVvX09mTU5jT1E6TXRGSlVuNG1UN3VDUW51WlY2djJjQSI=","V":"IjEyOTU3NjU3NDkyNDIi"}],"I":
[null],"S":[true]}
So it seems like it has both objects in the payload as expected.. but
no "something" value.
Ryan
On Jan 23, 12:42 pm, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> We do use ValueProxy-s and I believe they work (my co-workers would have
> blamed me otherwise, as I'm the one who pushed for the switch between
> GWT-RPC and RequestFactory).
>
> Do you see the "something" string (should be something like
> {"textData":"something"}) in the payload sent by the browser? (use Firebug
> or similar)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
