Hi Y2i,
Sorry to make you mis-understand.
I am query PTagLinks, which contains list of PTagOwned class, which
contains list of RIdxWord class.
As I said, i have tried multiple combinations of request 'with'. Even
i changed to "Req.with("pTagOwnedSet.grandChildren").fire". I can
still see PTagOwned list. RIdxwordProxy list in PTagOwnedProxy will be
null.
On Jan 25, 9:38 am, Y2i <yur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Assuming you are querying PTasLinks, does RIdxWord also have pTagOwnedSet
> array?
>
> I believe in the post Thomas meant something like
> Req.with("pTagOwnedSet.grandChildren.pTagOwnedSet").fire().
> That's what I would try too.
> Because with("pTagOwnedSet.grandChildren").with("pTagOwnedSet") must be the
> same as with("pTagOwnedSet.grandChildren")
>
> But honestly I've never done with() for more than 1 level, and only for 1:1
> relationships. I prefer querying sets little by little, and only when a
> user needs the data.
In the case of , how can you "query set little by little" in 2nd
level? please suggest. Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
