On 3 February 2011 16:05, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > I've noticed in the examples that @UiHandler annotated methods are declared > with no scope - so I'm assuming that its regular practice to rely on > protected scope. Is this correct?
You mean package private scope? The UiHandler methods may not be private. I usually just make them public as I consider them to be part of the page's/widgets API. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
