Sorry for the thread bump: So I was thinking a little bit more about this problem.
Both GIN and deferred binding respectively allow for customization of the widget's datasource during compile time. With gin I have a litte bit more flexibility (creating factory, singleton, etc)? For my personal taste the nicer/cleaner approach seems to be to use deferred binding to configure it. Is it actually possible to allow both? Configuration by either deferred binding or gin? And I still don't know how to solve the problem wiith the non-default constructor with either gin or deferred binding. In case of gin I might use a Factory but I am not sure if there is not a better approach. thanks in advance Uemit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
