So, I'm guessing there is nothing wrong with using JavaScriptObject.createArray() in place of the native function??
On Feb 18, 1:30 pm, Patrick Tucker <[email protected]> wrote: > I was looking at the code in PreefixTree to see if it would be > feasible to make it generic so I can pass it values other than a > String and noticed something that I thought was a little odd. See > init() in the following code snippets: > > private JavaScriptObject stack; > > public PrefixTreeIterator(PrefixTree tree) { > init(); > addTree(tree, ""); > > } > > private native void init() /*-{ > [email protected] > $PrefixTreeIterator::stack = []; > > }-*/; > > This basically got me wondering why the developer chose to assign > stack with a JNDI call instead of doing the following: > > private final JavaScriptObject stack = JavaScriptObject.createArray(); > > Is there something wrong with using JavaScriptObject.createArray() to > do this or was this particular function not available when the code > was written? > > This is code from 2.2 BTW. > > Thanks, > Pat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
