> I haven't worked with Groovy/Scala and Maven. Are you saying > Groovy/Scala code is supposed to go in src/main/resources? That would > indeed be strange.
Generally, no. Groovy (and maybe Scala too) is a little bit of an unusual case because (I think) you don't actually have to compile the source ahead of time. I would compile it, but if I didn't, I still wouldn't use src/main/resources for Groovy code. The project I work on does have some tests written in Groovy that live in src/test/groovy. I was figuring the same convention would apply to src/main for Groovy, Scala, etc. > The *.ui.xml files are certainly outliers. It would be nice to have > separate directories for specific GWT stuff. Maybe > src/main/gwt-resources or simply src/main/gwt. I like src/main/gwt myself. Indicates non-java sources that are used by the GWT compiler. Packaging of the files depends on whether it's an application or a library. Now, wouldn't it be nice to have a couple of maven packaging types that followed these conventions automatically... -Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
