There are always some ways to solve a problem. But, from the OOP point of view, I think, that your solution is better. I definetely have to make a note)))
On 29 мар, 23:12, ciosbel <[email protected]> wrote: > I mean that instead using List<Serializable> as base type (that will create > a serialization policy for all types that extend Serializable), you just use > List<MyDTO> where MyDTO is > > public interface MyDTO extends Serializable { > > } > > then gwt will create a serialization policy only for all types that > implement MyDTO. > > But if you are fine with Serializable, just use it. I think that manually > declare all possible types is avoidable. But i'm not an expert. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
