No opinion or experience of production of one of theses solutions ?
Thanks for any help

On Apr 8, 8:36 am, Rodolphe Gomes <rodolphe.go...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am talking abouthttp://puremvc.org/(NOT the concept MVC).
> There is a sample 
> :http://trac.puremvc.org/Demo_Java_MultiCore_GWT_EmployeeAdmin
>
> I have used it during one year on RCP (Eclipse plugin) and it is
> wonderfull. So I wonder if it is not better than MVP, wich is young
> and just a way to develop (not a complete library or framework).
>
> I thin mediator inPureMVCare like the EventBus...
>
> On 8 avr, 04:27, Brian Lough <bklo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa...
> > <http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa...>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM
>
> > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM>Hope those url's work, if you
> > haven't seen them already.
>
> > I'm leery of what you might mean by "pureMVC" as like more IT concepts, it
> > can get muddled: MVP being no exception.  I've implemented or worked with a
> > bunch of MVC implementations, J2EE and otherwise.  MVP is worth the effort
> > required to move to it, though, like MVC, there is no "pure" implementation
> > of it.  David Chandler gives a great synopsis of it in the first url: Ray
> > Ryan's video is the second.
>
> > No MVC implementation I've worked with since 1988 has been easy or less than
> > onerous to test, really at any level.  There is always too much inbreeding
> > of the layers.  MVP doesn't solve this, but can, if done right.  With MVP, I
> > typically get 90%+ code coverage on unit tests.  I can't get anywhere near
> > that with standard J2EE "Best Practices" MVC.
>
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Rodolphe Gomes 
> > <rodolphe.go...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > > Hello,
>
> > > I am still having doubts between integrating MVP orPureMVC.
> > > Does anyone has any production experience - drawbacks  ?
>
> > > Thanks a lot
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to