Right now in our project, we have below mentioned structure. Our project is mainly using GWT & Spring framework.
1 com.customername.projectname.client.module name 2 com.customername.projectname.client.rpc.module name 3 com.customername.projectname.shared.validator.module name 4 com.customername.projectname.server.module name 5 com.customername.projectname.spring.dao.module name 6 com.customername.projectname.spring.service.module name Our application.gwt.xml contains below entry for source which needs to be coverted in to java script. source path='client' source path='shared' As we are using spring @ the server side, we are using spring annotation to mark the services and DAO and then in applicationContext.xml we are using below configuration to scan the DAO and Service Layer. context:annotation-config context:component-scan base-package Now our client wants to go with below mentioned structure. Grouping everything by module. Also in our case module is not GWT module. It is just like diff. parts of the application. 1 com.customername.projectname.modulename.client 2 com.customername.projectname.modulename.rpc 3 com.customername.projectname.Modulename.validator 4 com.customername.projectname.Modulename.server 5 com.customername.projectname.Modulename.spring.dao 6 com.customername.projectname.Modulename.spring.Service My question is: 1 Is the upper approach is recommended considering it is very large application 2 If the above approach is to be implemented , how to go about setting up the packages/source files which needs to be converted by gwt compiler from java to java script. Should I mention each module name in application.gwt.xml? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
