Great!! -Nagin
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Honza Rames <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I'm making some preparations to release it on Google Code. I'll > post all the info there (I mean what it can > and cannot do and why some things are little bit different from java > reflection API). Hopefully I'll manage to do this during the > weekend... > > -- > Honza Rames > > On 2 čvn, 13:07, Nagin Kothari <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am very interessed on it. May you send the project to do a look to the > > code? > > > > regards > > > > Nagin Kothari > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Honza Rames <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, from what I can tell GWT doesn't support reflection at all in > > > client side (JS translatable) code. Just a few simple features like > > > getting class name (but I can't really call that reflection can > > > I ;-) ). I have been experimenting with reflection in client side code > > > though, and with a lot of success I must say :-). I'm planning to > > > share the code on Google Code when I feel its ready, I'm currently > > > testing it on business application I'm working on and then we'll see. > > > If you (or anybody else) would like to give it a try, I might be able > > > to create some package and share this with you (or maybe create the > > > Google Code project right away). There is similar framework (don't > > > remember the name but can be found by Google ;-) ), which didn't > > > really didn't do the job for me because it was pretty difficult to > > > generate the reflection information that is needed (please correct me > > > if I got that wrong). My approach uses GWT generators and annotations > > > to specify which packages and which classes should participate in > > > reflection information generation. I'm supporting similar > > > functionality that java Class gives you with some modifications, but > > > you can obtain annotations, get/set fields and even call public > > > methods and create new instance in reflective way (but you need to be > > > careful on what info you add because it could greatly enlarge your > > > resulting JS code). I also have unit tests (of course) for bunch of > > > stuff but it would require a lot of cleanup I guess. > > > > > So if anyone is interested just leave a message ;-) > > > > > -- > > > Honza Rames > > > > > On 31 kvě, 16:20, Adolfo Panizo Touzon <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Can somebody the function about de class Generator and all the > similar > > > > classes which is contained int he packpage "com.google.gwt.core.ext", > > > it´s > > > > used for deferred binding? > > > > > > Maybe if I want use reflection in my app, I must use these classes?? > > > > > > -- > > > > El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes. > > > > Warren Buffet > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
