See this
thread<http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/f539d58327a351d3?pli=1>.
Perhaps help you
2011/7/10 Potate <sammyjiang...@gmail.com>
> Thanks for the solution. Tho I forgot to mentioned that one of the
> requirements for the UI is to avoid paging. We would like to show a
> long list and let users scroll using the browser's scroll bar. I would
> definitely give a try at the showcased examples. Are there any other
> workarounds for this?
>
> thanks very much
>
> On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Tony Rah <xsegr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Attach a paging control to your cell widget and page say 10 or 20 rows
> > at a time. You can also adapt paging to the scroll bar so the user
> > doesnt have to press buttons. When the scroll gets to the end it will
> > render the next page. There are samples in the gwt showcase to give
> > you an idea how it all works.
> > On Jul 9, 9:28 pm, Potate <sammyjiang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi
> >
> > > I have 100+ rows to render in a celltable. The actual data is
> > > downloaded quite fast via RPC call. However, rendering these 100+ rows
> > > in IE6 is awfully slow. It also causes temporary UI lockups. Is it
> > > possible to render the table in chunks? maybe like 10 rows at a time
> > > incrementally? I tried the following but it doesn't seem to work in
> > > IE6. I still get lockups:
> >
> > > Scheduler.get().scheduleIncremental(new RepeatingCommand() {
> > > int cur = 0;
> >
> > > @Override
> > > public boolean execute() {
> > > int size = data.size();
> >
> > > List<OrderEntry> batch = data.subList(
> > > cur, Math.min(cur+BATCH_SIZE, size));
> >
> > > tableDataProvider.getList().addAll( batch );
> > > tableDataProvider.flush();
> >
> > > cur = cur + BATCH_SIZE;
> > > if (cur >= size-1) {
> > > // force a sort
> > > ColumnSortEvent.fire(table,
> > > table.getColumnSortList());
> > > return false;
> > > } else {
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > });
> >
> > > also, I'm forcing a sort to put the sortable headers in the right
> > > state, even tho data got back from the server is already sorted. is
> > > there a way to avoid it?
> >
> > > thanks
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
