On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can assign your response to an instance variable, you just can not > write this.variable inside onSuccess because that references the Receiver > and not the real class that contains the async call. Just omit "this" and it > should work. Yep, that's basically what I've done too but I could not imagine assigning a value to a (global) field could be advisable. > If you want to be complete you could write it the long way > "RealClass.this.variablename". I do this all the time in my async callbacks. > But its only useful if you want to remember some information obtained by an > async call. That's almost always the case. > If you really need to process the response you have to do it in the > onSuccess method either directly or by calling a separate method (or by > firing an event which is basically the same as calling a separate method). So If I have a callback that requires a value from another callback, I have to chain these callbacks? Could result in a pretty long callback chain... -Alex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
