Thanks Magno Machado Paulo. You are suggesting to reverse the calls. Meaning first call RPC to load model then gwt async to load view&presenter. second gwt async can be called only on success of first rpc for model. to make sure model is available in all conditions.
So there are two async server calls no matter how we do it. more over code splitting is not transparent like individual pages, where you send which ever page you want filled with data to client. We should have flexibility to serve the page either from client or server, so that we can get advantage of both worlds. Every thing on client including decision making may not fit well for enterprise class solutions as all Enterprise resources are at server, which are well protected etc. It would be awesome if we get best of both worlds. -Venu http://schoolk12.appspot.com/ On Aug 6, 3:07 am, Magno Machado <[email protected]> wrote: > You could use your server to fetch the data and embed it on the host page. > Then when the GWT code is loaded, it can read the data and render the screen > without making a new request on the server... For exemple: > User requesthttp://your-app.com/?page=contactlist > The server receives the request, fetch a list of contacts on the DB and > write it on the hostpage > The host page is sent back to the browser > The browser loads the host page, which in turn load your GWT code > In your entrypoint, you read what is the current page, make an async call to > load the javascript for that page > Instead of making a RPC call to load the data, you can read the data already > embeded on the host page > > Now the user clicks on an "Edit contact" link on the page > The browser will send a get request > forhttp://your-app.com/?page=editcontact&contactid=1 > > I don't know how mobile browsers cache pages (maybe for the sake of disk > space, they don't?), but hopefully all the JS will get cached on the browser > once they're loaded for the first time > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:49 AM, dreamer <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply Magno Machado Paulo. > > > Code splitting is a console, documentation is telling on main page, > > for every event click where > > ever we need to load composite, suggested to use GWT.runAsync. > > > But the problem is I ended up getting Async call within Another Async > > call, one for loading composite, on success another > > async RPC call to get Model, for some reason even main page is not > > that fast, in fact I observed some slow. > > This is pure implementation issue. > > > Conceptually, why async call to load another page, why don't we submit > > entire page and get fresh page along with model applied to view on > > server itself like jsp? > > Why don't I use jsp? - I want to develop like a swing app with ajax > > capability and drag and drop designer. > > > On Aug 5, 7:27 pm, Magno Machado <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What it your app read a particular parameter on the URL that tell the app > > > what "page" should be rendered, then everytime you need to display a new > > > page, you generate a get request with the parameter for the page you wish > > to > > > display. > > > > If you use runAsync on each page, the browser will always load only the > > JS > > > for the current page, not the whole app code > > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:50 PM, dreamer <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > How about if it is possible to build Rich Internet Page (RIP), in a > > > > more productive tool like GWT designer and eclipse plug etc > > > > and server serving these pages using some web framework ? > > > > > My friend asked why don't you hand code html+ajax, sure that is > > > > perfect, if that magic is possible with GWT, how productive it would > > > > be? > > > > > What is wrong with GWT RIA apps, Problem is I don't see pages, I see > > > > entire app,comes onto browser and my server becomes dummy. > > > > > What is wrong server being dummy? because Browser is supposed to be > > > > thin and you can use it on 10 devices in single day. > > > > > You open browser on cell phone, laptop,desktop where not, still use > > > > the same app. so application can not be one big bundle. > > > > > It needs to be page at a time. Ok, then it is not RIA app, then it is > > > > RIP. > > > > > So why I don't I settle for a RIP (Rich Internet Page) ? - looks cool > > > > to me. Is it possible to build using my favorite GWT+AppEngine. ? > > > > > Stay tuned, I will Let you know > > > > > ---Dreamer > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]. > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > Magno Machado Paulohttp://blog.magnomachado.com.brhttp:// > > code.google.com/p/emballo/ > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > Magno Machado > Paulohttp://blog.magnomachado.com.brhttp://code.google.com/p/emballo/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
