Yes, it is freaking messy. It works, but it is nothing to be proud of... ;) Dnd does not fit my use case, we are moving appointments in a fixed 15min grid with two clicks. I played a little bit with fixed position but got it running faster with an ugly flex table.
Thanks for sharing thoughts On Aug 4, 12:23 pm, Paul Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like that approach will be really messy. When you add a new > appointment, you will have to work out what row to put it in according to > what other appointments there are, and their duration. Also, consider whether > you will ever want to have multiple appointments at the same time, and how > that might work. > > Why not use an absolute panel, and then you can place divs exactly where you > want them and give them the size they should have. Also, it would then be > more natural to set up drag and drop to create/move/resize appointments. > > HTH > Paul > > On 04/08/11 12:13, P.G.Taboada wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I am fighting flex table and rowspan. I am using a table to render 15 > > min timeslots for a calendar. Then I load the appointments and place > > them into the right timeslots, with the rowspan according to the > > duration of the appointment. > > > When I add the appointment rowspan I do delete the slots below. > > > My appointments are sorted by date, so I am adding them col by col. > > > It is a big difference if I first remove the time slots below, or if I > > first add the appointments. Neither way I get the table right. > > > I am sure this is nothing new and maybe someone already has compiled a > > list of tips for the flex table. > > > Would be nice. > > > brgds, > > > Papick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
