On Sep 9, 10:31 am, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: > .with() has nothing to do with lazy-loading or "lazy initialization > exceptions"; it's only about what goes over the wire, and what's available > on the client-side.
Right, but if I haven't explicitly said that a certain property is going over the wire, then why is GWT accessing it with this AutoBeanVisitor? > I don't know Gilead (and I actually don't use JPA or JDO, but if I had to, I > wouldn't use lazy-loading, it causes much more burden than what it's > supposed to "solve", it's not worth it, it's a lie, it's counterproductive > in the long run; JPA/JDO, like much "enterprisey" things, are > over-engineered and much too complicated to get them to work unless you're > an expert in the field). You might have a good point there, but I'm not likely to remove Hibernate from this app. Many problems would be solved if Hibernate just automatically removed every instrumentation it does on entities after they're detached. I asked about Gilead because apparently that's what it does, but I haven't found any examples of somebody mixing Gilead and RF. Thank you, Tiago. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
