No. There is no issue in putting JIBX *.java files in shared package. I use
it in shared package without any issue.
Make sure you r using JIBX 1.2.3

Deepak


On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, J.Ganesan <[email protected]>wrote:

> Mike,
>
>  Will there be any issue in putting the JIBX generated *.java files in
> shared package ? If not, JIBX has a huge advantage. I tried to put the
> *.java files from JAXB in shared package  and I encountered a number
> of compilation problems.
>
> J.Ganesan
> www.DataStoreGwt.com
>
> On Sep 15, 8:23 pm, Maiku <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you are not totally tied to JAXB you may want to check out JIBX. I
> > was successfully using the beans that it creates on both Server side
> > and Client side.  The way it marshals is by injecting information into
> > the bytecode and this seems to allow GWT to still recognize the source
> > of the beans as being the same as the compiled server object.
> >
> > I have since refactored to use RequestFactory so that this entire
> > issue is moot but if you cannot then I highly recommend JIBX.
> >
> > - Mike
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to