On 10/05/2011 10:26 AM, scott.ellswo...@gmail.com wrote: > Howdy, all, > > Is anyone using webstorage or indexedDB client side data storage with > GWT? Pointers to projects appreciated...
See http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/storage/client/Storage.html You can see an example at http://code.google.com/p/gwt-sked/source/browse/trunk/%20gwt-sked%20--username%20jchimene%40gmail.com/Sked/src/com/systasis/sked/client/model/SkedStorage.java > > Aside: > > I note that the WebStorage group reached an impasse and stopped > supporting the spec last fall. Could you provide a pointer to this? I'd heard something about it, but I was under the impression that it was resolved by moving to a separate spec from the HTML 5 spec. > I note further that http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/ seems to be alive > and kicking, but a brief reading seemed to indicate that this is a > great system for key-object mappings, but not so great for the generic > sql case of "select rows from foo where name is blah group by this > order by that" kind of queries. ( might be wrong - section 3.1.3 keys > can be DOMStrings. Since can supply a keyrange to an index, you may > be able to generate the kind of selects I am used to, as long as you > can generate an index such that the result of that query would be > expressable as either indexkey==foo or low < indexkey < hig. > > Aside aside, does anyone have real world experience? I do not mind if > the results only work on Chrome/FF/Safari, but IE would also be cool. The GWT storage API works for me in IE9. As usual, YMMV. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
